Zinstall vs USMT
Learn about pros and cons of Zinstall and USMT for your migration project.
Microsoft User State Migration Tool (USMT) is a nice free tool that covers some of the common migration scenarios. If your organization has enough resources to spare, does not mind spending a few month on building a proper USMT transition environment, and the transfers needed are non-personalized and standardized, USMT will probably do the job.
If so, when is Zinstall more applicable?
- When you do not have the resources or time to spend several month on preparation, development and training
- When you prefer your tool to be simple to use, even by less-qualified operators
- When you need to transfer personalized, diverse workstations
- When some transfers are cross-Windows version (i.e., Windows XP to Windows 7 or Windows 7 to Windows 8), cross-hardware make and model (i.e., HP to Dell)
- When you need a tool that is both automatic and highly-configurable when needed
Here is what you gain with Zinstall:
- Usable immediately, out of the box
- no deployment, scripting, training required
- Portable
,
remotely executable
, centrally executable, including
command-line interface
- Fully automatic
by default, yet
fully configurable
- allows to exclude/include specific applications, folders, files, profiles, even registry entries
- Transfers it all:
files, profiles, settings, personalization, even applications
- Supports program-less transfer
- if you have your application image set, and are looking for a a way to transfer all personalization for each user
- Supports various migration scenarios:
over the network
,
from a hard drive
, via
shared storage
, via
external storage
, in-place upgrades
- Allows migration
to VDI, to Cloud, P2V, V2V and V2P
- Made for IT tech use - used by service providers, PC techs, OEMs, and
many, many businesses worldwide
- Flexible licensing and activation structure